Monday, October 20, 2014

Conclusion


If you have read this far, you are probably fully convinced by now that the “parampara” created by Bhaktisiddhanta is wrong and thus useless, and are convinced of the need to take diksa in a real authentic Gaudiya Vaisnava parampara.

You may ask, where do I find such a real guru parampara? There are plenty of bonafide Gaudiya Vaisnava gurus in Radha Kund, and in Vrindavan, and also in Navadweep (NOT Mayapur).

I wish you all success and hope that you are able to absorb yourself in Radha-Krishna lila meditations, as that is the essence of Gaudiya Vaisnavism.


JAI SRI RADHE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Saturday, October 18, 2014

More evidence that Bipin Bihari Goswami rejected Bhaktivinod as his disciple

The latest scholarly essay written by Nitai das about this subject:


Vipinavihari Gosvami and Bhaktivinoda

In 1879 the Deputy Magistrate and Deputy Collector of Yasohara-Nadail, Kedaranatha Datta, received initiation from him. With Kedaranatha's help he founded a religious journal called the Sajjana tosani (“Pleasing to Good People”). In that journal he published many essays on Vaisnava scripture and his translation of the Visnusahasranama (“Thousand Names of Visnu”). In 1886 through Vipinavihari's efforts the Gosvamins of Baghnapara bestowed the title of Bhaktivinoda on Kedaranatha. 

Though Bhaktivinoda was very dear to Vipinavihari and they cooperated with each other on a number of projects and endeavors, their relationship ended on a sour note. Bhaktivinoda sometime before his passing in 1914 asked his guru Vipinavihari to endorse and broadcast Bhaktivinoda's claim that the Muslim habitation of Navadvipa known as Miyapura was the original site of Mayapura where Sri Caitanya was born. Vipinavihari refused to do so. Instead, for his promotion of false ideas and practices Bhaktivinoda was rejected by Vipinavihari. Vipinavihari revealed this to the Vaisnava world in a letter published in 1919 in the Asvina (September-October) issue of the journal Gauranga-sevaka.

Thursday, October 16, 2014

Bhaktivinod Thakur was a collaborator with the British

Bhaktivinod Thakur was a collaborator with the British

We are all familiar with the story of Bhaktivinod Thakur and how he arrested the yogi Bisakisena. ISKCON claims that Bhaktivinod arrested Bisakisena because he had been using his yogic powers to seduce other men's wives and have sex with them. But is this true?

From Krishna.com's official biography of Bhaktivinod, we learn the following:

http://www.krishna.com/life-srila-bhaktivinoda-thakur

"Bisakisena declared he'd drive off the British from ruling Orissa and would himself become king. He published such statements, which were circulated all around Orissa. The British thought him a revolutionary for speaking out against the British rule, so the district governor of Bengal drew up arrest orders."

After Bhaktivinod arrested him, "The fearless Bhaktivinod tried Bisakisena in Puri. The trial lasted 18 days... Bhaktivinod pronounced the man guilty and sentenced him to 18 months for political conspiracy."

Note the last part, "sentenced him to 18 months in jail for POLITICAL CONSPIRACY". NOT for "having sex with other men's wives". Bhaktivinod persecuted an innocent person simply for having anti-government political views.

Bhaktivinod was a British collaborator, and a traitor to India. The British committed unspeakable atrocities in India, which you can read about here:

http://www.rense.com/general53/brith.htm

If the British were evil people and Bhaktivinod was a high ranking magistrate in their government, a collaborator with the British, is it incorrect then to say that Bhaktivinod was also an evil person?


Bhaktivinod was also rejected by his guru Bipin Bihari Goswami for falsifying evidence in order to claim that Mayapur was the real birthsite of Caitanya Mahaprabhu, which you can learn about in the following book called "The True History of Bhaktisiddhanta":

http://www.mediafire.com/view/e3717aola66h1d8/True_History_of_Bhaktisiddhanta.pdf

Also noteworthy is that Bhaktivinod was eating meat, fish, eggs, and using opium.

The "parampara" of Bhaktivinod, Bhaktisiddhanta, and Bhaktivedanta is invalid and not bonafide because they have no connection to any real Gaudiya Vaisnava parampara. The two leading scholarly disciples of Bhaktisiddhanta named Ananta Vasudeva and Sundarananda realized this after Bhaktisiddhanta had passed away and because of their preaching, they convinced at least 50 percent of the Gaudiya Math to reject Bhaktisiddhanta and go take sheler of the bonafide Gaudiya Vaisnava paramparas. Sundarananda even wrote a book where he refuted all of Bhaktisiddhanta's wrong ideas, and you can read it online here (it is in bengali and has not yet been translated into English yet):

http://www.mediafire.com/view/gthnm1dafl4v15w/guru_svarupa_sundarananda.pdf

If you are actually serious about attaining Radha and Krishna, you will have to accept a bonafide Gaudiya Vaisnava guru coming in an unbroken diksa line from the time of the Six Goswamis. Plenty of such gurus exist even to this day in both Vrindavan and Navadwip, so you can find them there.

PS. Prabhupada mentioned that the word "Hindu" never appeared in the Vedas and was a word created by the Muslim invaders, that they could not pronounce the "S" in the word "Sindhu" and so they called it "Hindu" instead.

The following link is a scholarly article written by Dr. Murlidhar H. Pahoja and he gives evidence that the word "Hindu" has been in use since at least 500BC. Remember, the Muslims invaded India in the 8th century AD, so that totally discredit's Prabhupada's claim about the original usage of the word Hindu.

http://b-i-f.com/hindu.pdf

Tuesday, October 14, 2014

Bhaktisiddhanta's bogus teachings about raganuga bhakti


 Qualification For Rägänugä Bhakti
DOES ONE NEED TO BE A ‘PURE DEVOTEE”
TO START RÄGÄNUGA PRACTISE?
rägänugä bhakti means allegiance to the eternally perfect rägätmikä-devotees of Vraja. Such is the teaching of Çréla Rüpa Gosvämé in Bhakti Rasämåta Sindhu (1.2.271):
viräjantém abhivyaktaà vrajaväsé janädiñu
rägätmikäm anusåtä yä sä rägänugocyate
Before we speak of rägätmikä bhakti and rägänugä bhakti we must first know what is räga. Räga is that deep natural loving thirst which causes us to become completely absorbed in our beloved deity:
iñöe svärasiké rägaù paramäviñöatä bhavet
tanmayé yä bhaved bhaktiù sätra rägätmikoditä
(Bhakti Rasämåta Sindhu 1.2.272)
Çréla Jéva Gosvämé has defined räga and rägänuga as follows:
tatra viñayiaù sväbhäviko viñaya saàsargecchätiçayamayaù premä räga yathä cakñurädénäà saundaryädau tädåça evätra bhaktasya çré bhagavatyapi räga ityucyate.............yasya pürvokte räga-viçeñe rucir eva jätästi na tu räga-viçeña eva svayaà tasya tädåça räga-sudhäkara karäbhäsa samullasita hådaya sphaöika-maëeù çästrädi çrutäsu tädåçyä rägätmikäyä bhakteù paripäöéñvapi rucir jäyate. tatas tadéyaà rägaà rucyänugacchanté sä rägänugä tasyaiva pravartate (Bhakti Sandarbha 310).
"Räga means the strong and natural desire of a sense-enjoyer for his beloved sense-objects. The senses, like the eyes, are naturally attracted to their objects, such as beautiful forms, and they need no encouragement in this. In the same way, when a devotee's heart is naturally attracted to the Lord and he has a deep thirst for the Lord then this is called räga. When a mere ray of the nectar-moon of such räga falls on the crystal-like hearts of those devotees who only have some taste for a particular räga but do not possess that räga itself yet, then the heart rejoices and as a result of hearing from the scriptures and saints taste will awaken within the heart of such a devotee for the devotional expertise of a rägätmika bhakta. This means that ruci (taste) will awaken within the heart when we hear about the loving devotional expertise of a rägätmika vraja-bhakta from the scriptures or from the mouth of a saint whose heart is pure, that is, free from lust, anger and envy. The devotion which follows the räga of a rägätmikä Vraja-devotee along with ruci is called rägänugä bhakti".
Both the vidhi-devotee and the räga-devotee may therefore begin, simultaneously, with the path of devotion, from the stage of anartha nivåtti, cessation of unwanted habits, progressing through the stages that have been described by Çréla Qualification for rägänugä bhakti
2 October 27, 2013

Rüpa Gosvämé in his Bhakti Rasämåta Sindhu 1.4.15-16 (ädau çraddhä tathä sädhu saìgo'tha bhajana kriyä). The difference between them lies not in personal purity, but in their mood. In other words, rägänuga bhakti runs parallel with vaidhi bhakti, and not only sequentially. Çréla Rüpa Gosvämé writes in Bhakti Rasämåta Sindhu (1.2.291):
rägätmikaika niñöhä ye vrajaväsé janädayaù
teñäà bhäväptaye lubdho bhaved aträdhikäravän
"Those who are anxious ('greedy') to attain the mood of the eternal, exclusively fixed-up Rägätmika Vrajaväsés, are eligible to enter into Rägänugä Bhakti." The räga devotee is under the divine illusion that Kåñëa is equal or inferior to him, following in the footsteps of the inhabitants of Vraja (vrajalokänusärataù, Bhakti Rasämåta Sindhu), whose attitude of intimate, spontaneous love, free from awe and reverence, is described in the Tenth Canto of Çrémad Bhägavata.
rägänugä bhakti is not only for perfected souls beyond the stage of anartha nivåtti
It is not a fact that rägänugä bhakti comes after the stage of sädhanä bhakti (devotion in practise). First of all, what is sädhana bhakti? Çréla Rüpa Gosvämé says in Bhakti Rasämåta Sindhu 1.2.2: kåti-sädhya bhavet sädhya bhävä sä sädhanäbdhidhä - “That goal of bhäva bhakti is to be attained through practise with the senses (kåti). This is called sädhanä.“ Bhakti Rasämåta Sindhu 1.2.5 then declares: vaidhi rägänuga ceti sa dvidha sädhanäbhidhä – “There are two kinds of sädhana — vaidhi and rägänugä” Nowhere it is said that rägänugä bhakti is a post graduate state of vaidhi bhakti. C.C. Madhya 22,108 confirms this—
ei sädhana bhakti dui to prakära; eka vaidhi bhakti—rägänugä bhakti ära:
"There are two kinds of devotion in practise. One is called vaidhi bhakti and the other rägänugä bhakti." Different äcäryas that follow Bhaktisiddhänta Sarasvaté claim that rägänugä bhakti commences at the stage of niñöha, ruci or even bhäva, but there is not a word of evidence for that in the authorised scriptures on the topic, like Bhakti Rasämåta Sindhu or its commentaries, Bhakti Sandarbha, Mädhurya Kädambiné or Räga Vartma Candrikä. Caitanya Caritämåta (Ädi 4, 231-232, 235-237) declares:
e sob siddhänta güòh – kohite nä juwäy; nä kohile keho anta nähi päy
ataeva kohi kichu koriyä nigüòh; bujhibe rasik bhakta nä bujhibe müòh
…………
abhakta uñörera ithe nä hoy pravesh; tabe cite hoy mora änanda viçesh
ye lägi kohite bhoy, se yadi nä jäne; ihä boi kibä such äche tribhuvane
ataeva bhaktagane kore namaskära; nihçanke kohiye tär hauk camatkära
“All these topics are confidential and shouldn’t be discussed, but if they were not discussed then no one would be able to find out about them. Hence I will disclose some confidential matters now, which will be understood by rasika devotees, but not Qualification for rägänugä bhakti
3 October 27, 2013

by the fools…..If the camel-like non-devotees cannot grasp such topics then I will be in ecstasy. What greater joy could there be in the three worlds if they, for whom I fear to speak out, will not know of this? Therefore I offer my respects to the devotees and speak out fearlessly. Let the devotees be astonished about what I am about to disclose!” Çrémad Bhägavata (10.33.36) declares:
anugrahäya bhütänäà mänuñäà deham ästhitaù;
bhajate tädåçiù kréòä yäù çrutvä tat-paro bhavet
“Çré Kåñëa performed the Räsa-lélä out of compassion for all conditioned souls and anyone who hears of this becomes His devotee.”
Çré Jéva Gosvämé comments in his Vaiñëava Toñaëé-comment on this verse:
ataeva tädåça bhakta prasaìgena tädåçéù sarva cittäkarñiéù kréòä bhajate, yäù sädhäranair api çrutvä bhaktebhyo'nyo'pi janas tatparo bhavet. kim uta räsa lélä rüpam imäà çrutvetyarthaù vakñyate ca—vikréòitaà vrajavadhübhir idaà ca viñëoù (S.B. 10.33.39) ityädi. yad vä mänuñaà deham äçritaù sarvo'pi jévas tatparo bhavet martyaloke çré bhagavad avatärät tathä bhajane mukhyatväcca manuñyänäm eva sukhena tac chravaëädi siddheù.
"Kåñëa performs this all-attractive pastime for His devotees, but even ordinary people are attracted to this game by hearing about it. Even they thus become exclusively devoted to the Lord. This will be further explained in verse 10.33.39. The words mänuñaà deham äçritaù also indicate that the jévas that attained a human form are able to hear of this pastime and thus become devotees. The Lord descends on the human planets and it is here that the worship of the Lord assumes its most important form. Hence human beings can blissfully attain perfection by hearing of this pastime." Çrémad Bhägavata 10.33.39 declares that the senses do not become sexually agitated by hearing or reading of the Räsa-lélä, but rather that they become freed from lust.
vikréòitaà vraja-vadhübhir idam ca viñëoù
çraddhänvitaà nu'çåëuyed atha varëayed yaù
bhaktià paraà bhagavatià pratilabhya kämaà
håd rogam äçv apahinoty acirena dhéraà
"Anyone who faithfully hears and describes the pastimes of Lord Viñëu (Kåñëa) with the ladies of Vraja (the gopés) will attain supreme devotion to God and will soon become free from the heart's disease of lust."
Çré Jéva Gosvämé comments as follows on this verse:
çraddhayä viçväsenänvita iti. tad viparétävajïa rüpäparädha......bhaktià prema lakñaëäà paräà çré gopikä premänusäritvät sarvottama jätéyäm. pratikñaaà nütanatvena labdhä håd roga rüpaà kämam iti bhagavad viñayaù käma viçeño vyavacchinnaù tasya parama prema rüpatvena tad vaiparétyät......anyatra çruyate (çré gétä 18.54) brahma bhüta prasannätmä na çocati na käìkñati samaù sarveñu bhüteñu mad bhaktià labhate paraà. ityatra tu håd rogäpahänät pürvam eva parama bhakti präptiù tasmät parama balavad evedaà sädhanam iti bhävaù Qualification for rägänugä bhakti
4 October 27, 2013

"çraddhänvitä means hearing with faith. This word is used to avoid the offence of disbelieving or disregarding the scriptures — that is contrary to the principles of hearing and chanting......The highest devotion is that of the gopés and hearing and chanting of their devotion is so powerful that this supreme devotion appears in the heart even before the heart's disease of lust is chased out of it......This despite verse 18.54 of the Gétä, that shows an opposite sequence. This shows that hearing and chanting of the Räsa-lélä is the most powerful sädhana in existence."
Çré Viçvanätha Cakravarté, in his commentary on the same verse, condemns those who do not believe this statement of the Bhägavata, that prema comes before the cessation of lust, as nästikas, or atheists, and mürkhas, or fools— dhéraù paëòita iti håd roge satyapi kathaà premä bhaved ityanästikya lakñaëena mürkhatvena rahita...The word yaù is very significant. It means anyone who hears and describes this with faith. First the lamp (of pure love) is kindled, and then the darkness (of lust and ignorance) is destroyed. rägänugä bhakti, devotion following one's sacred passion, is therefore not necessarily only meant for the most advanced, purified souls. The distinction between practitioners of vidhi bhakti (compulsory devotion) and räga bhakti (passionate devotion) is made because of their mood and attitude, not because of their possible different levels of purity. Çré Caitanya Mahäprabhu pointed out to Vyenkata Bhaööa (in Caitanya Caritämåta Madhya 9) that the goddess of fortune performed many purifying austerities to attain the position of the gopés, but that she could still not attain it because she lacked their sweet intimate attitude towards Him.
ei lägi sukha bhoga chäòi ciro-käla;
vrata niyam kori tapa korilo apära
"Just to associate with Kåñëa, Lakñmé gave up all sense enjoyment for long and performed severe austerities, following many regulative principles" (C.C. Madhya 9, 113) räsa na päilo lakñmé, çästre iha çuni — "Lakñmé did not attain the Räsa dance, I have heard from the revealed scriptures" (C.C. Madhya 9, 120)
vrajendra nandana boli' täre jäne vrajajana;
aiçvarya jïäne nähi kon sambandha manana
vraja-lokera bhäve yei koroye bhajan;
sei jana päya vraje vrajendra nandana
"The people of Vraja know Him as the son of Vrajendra, and they consider that there can be no relationship with Him in awe and reverence. Those who worship Kåñëa in the mood of the people of Vraja, will attain that Vrajendra-nandana in Vraja." (C.C Madhya 9,130-131)
Çréla Viçvanätha Cakravartépäda writes in chapter 1 of Mädhurya Kädambini:
bhaktes tu 'vikréòitaà vrajavadhübhiù' ityädau— bhaktià paräà bhagavati pratilabhya kämaà håd rogam äçvapahinotyacirena dhéraù (bhäg. 10.33.39) ityatra 'ktvä' pratyayena håd rogavatyevädhikäriëi paramäyä api tasyäù prathamam eva praveças tatas tayaiva parama svatantrayä kämädénäm apagamaç ca. teñäà kadäcit Qualification for rägänugä bhakti
5 October 27, 2013

sattve'pi 'api cet suduräcäro bhajate mam' iti 'bädhyamäno'pi mad bhakta' ityädibhiç ca tadvatäà na kväpi çästreñu nindä leço'pi.
“Although lust is also considered a fault on the path of bhakti, one can still enter the devotional path, despite being still afflicted by lust and other material desires. Çrémad-Bhägavata (10.33.39) says:
“A person who faithfully hears or describes the Lord’s pastimes of räsa-lélä with the gopés of Vraja attains supreme devotion of the Lord. He quickly becomes steady and conquers over the senses, giving up lust, the disease of the heart.”
In this text “after attaining supreme devotion” is an unfinished act, showing that bhakti can be attained even though one has lusty desires. This shows the most independent nature and power of bhakti to destroy lusty desires. Sometimes lusty desires exist even while practicing devotion. From verses like, “If the most sinful person worships Me exclusively...” (Gétä 9.30) and “Though my devotee is afflicted by lusty desires...” (Ç.B. 11.14.18) it is clear that though lusty desires may exist in a devotee, still he is not condemned even slightly.”
There is no guarantee that someone who practises vaidhi bhakti is automatically promoted to rägänugä bhakti, rather Çréla Rüpa Gosvämé says in Bhakti Rasämåta Sindhu (1.2.309): kåñëa tad bhakta kärunya mätra läbhaika hetukä "Only by the grace of Kåñëa and His devotees this path of rägänugä bhakti is attained." Çréla Rüpa Gosvämé says in Padyävalé:
kåñëa bhakti rasa bhävitä matiù kréyatäà yadi kuto'pi labhyate
tatra laulyam api mülyam ekalaà janma koöi sukåtair na labhyate
"No ten million lifetimes of following regulative principles will give you taste for Kåñëa-bhakti. The only price is greed! Purchase it as soon as it is available anywhere!" It is on sale where the rasika bhaktas speak about Rädhä-Kåñëa. In connection with the above çloka, to use the saying "Fools rush in where Angels fear to tread" is an offence to Çré Rüpa Gosvämé's followers, calling them fools. This 'fools rush in' is a mundane saying which applies to mundane impulsive people and their actions. Çréla Viçvanätha Cakravartépäda teaches in Räga Vartma Candrikä (1.5): näpi lobhanéya vastu präptau svasya yogyäyogyatva vicäraù ko'py udbhavati: "No candidate ever considers whether he is qualified for this path of rägänugä bhakti or not". 1
1 HAVING SAID ALL THIS, My Guru Sädhu Bäbä, Kåñëadäs Madrasi Bäbä, Rohiëéndranäth Mitra and Madanmohan Däs Bäbäjé, all great souls, told me, independently from each other, it is better not to read rasa çästra when one is too lusty. I understood that is because when one is an emotionally and physically active lover one will identify with the lélä of Rädhä-Kåñëa and that is an offence called ahaìgropäsana, meditating on oneself as the deity. Çréla Jéva Gosvämé says in Bhakti Sandarbha (276) that smaraëa (even just of the holy name, let alone Rädhä-Kåñëa’s intimate lélä) requires a pure heart – näma smaraëam tu çuddhäntaù-karaëatäm apekñate. Çré Jéva Gosvämé has also written (Bhakti Sandarbha 275): atha çaraëäpattyädibhiù çuddhäntaù karaëaç cet....näma saìkértanäparityägena smaranaà kuryat "When the mind is purified by the process of surrender, one should practise the devotional item of recollection without giving up näma sankértana." kintu rahasya-lélä tu pauruña-vikäravad indriyaiù……nopäsyä “But the intimate pastimes should not be meditated upon by (those Qualification for rägänugä bhakti
6 October 27, 2013

whose) senses are affected by masculine transformations.” (Bhakti Sandarbha 338) When one is less heated one can read these books, and the topic will work as a medicine, as has been promised by the Bhägavata in the final verse of the Räsa lélä-narration (10.33.39). There are subtle desires, called väsanä, cherished by people who actually control their outer senses. That can be there, OK, and one can still read rasa çästra, but to be grossly active in sex and read rasa çästra, is not something approved by the mahätmäs I knew. Çréla Jéva Gosvämé said in Gopäla Campü (pürva 23.1): tad etad govinda vraja vijana käntänuvacanaà dadhadbhir yogyasya çravasi paramäpyaà na sadasi 'This confidential Räsa-lélä topic is to be heard by qualified people who carry Govinda in their hearts, not in a public assembly."
So who IS then unqualified to hear it?
This is also explained by Çréla Jéva Gosvämé in his commentary on Bhakti Rasämåta Sindhuù (3.5.2), which deals with madhura rasa: (nivåttänupayogitväd durühatväd ayaà rasaù) - nivåtteñu präkåta çåìgära rasa sämya dåñöyä çré bhägavatäd apyasmäd virakteñvanupayogitväd ayogyatvät “Because of lack of qualification of those who are without taste for this rasa related to the Lord, caused by their equating it with material love.”
In other words, mistaking this rasa to be an ordinary mundane affair disqualifies one from entering into rägänugä bhajana.
One cannot learn vidhi bhakti from the guru and then just learn rägänugä bhakti from books, because your guru did not teach you rägänugä bhakti. Çréla Raghunätha däsa Gosvämé says: asambhäñya tad bhäva gambhéra cittän kuto çyäma sindho rasasyävagähaù "How can one enter into the Çyäma-ocean without having conversed with a devotee whose heart is steeped in love for Rädhä?" Çré Viçvanätha Cakravarté writes in his Räga Vartma Candrikä (1.6).
sa ca bhagavat kåpä hetuko'nurägé bhakta kåpä hetukaçceti dvividhaù. tatra bhakta kåpä hetuko dvividhaù präktana ädhunikaçca. präktanaù paurvabhavika tädåça bhakta kåpotthaù ädhunikaù etajjanmävadhi tädåça bhakta kåpotthaù. ädye sati lobhänantaraà tädåça guru caraëäçrayaëam. dvitéye guru caraëäçrayänantaraà lobha pravåttir bhavati.
"There are two causes for the appearance of sacred greed: The mercy of God or the mercy of an anurägé devotee. There are again two kinds of mercy bestowed by a devotee: präktana and ädhunika. präktana means mercy bestowed by a rägänugä bhakta in a previous life, and ädhunika is mercy bestowed in the present birth. The präktana-devotee takes shelter of the lotus feet of a rägänugä guru after the sacred greed has arisen in him, the ädhunika will get that sacred greed after surrendering to the feet of such a guru."
Çréla Rüpa Gosvämé gives the following definition of pure devotion in Bhakti Rasämåta Sindhu (1.1.17)
kleçaghni çubhadä mokña laghutäkåt sudurllabhä
sändränanda viçeñätmä çré kåñëäkarñiëé ca sä Qualification for rägänugä bhakti
7 October 27, 2013

“1. It destroys all grief and suffering, meaning sins, including the cause of sin, 2. it bestows auspiciousness, 3. it lightens the importance of liberation, 4. it is rare 5. it is deeply blissful and 6. it attracts Çré Kåñëa.”
In his commentary, Çré Viçvanätha Cakravarté spells out: tatra sädhana bhaktiù kleçaghéti çubhadä rüpä ca – “The symptoms of sädhana bhakti are the first two items – destroying grief, or sin, and bestowing auspiciousness.”
The same Viçvanätha Cakravarté writes in his Mädhurya Kädambini (2.2):
….sva-sparçeëa sparçamaëir iva karaëa våttér api präkåtatva-lohatäà çanais-tyäjayitvä cinmayatva çuddha jämbunadatäà präpayantyäù kandalébhävänte samudgacchantyäù sädhanäbhikhye dve patrike vivriyete. tayoù prathamä kleçaghné dvitéyä çubdhadeti. dvayor api tayor antas tu lobha pravartakatva lakñaëa-caikkanyena 'yeñäm ahaà priya ätmä sutaç ca.' ityädi çuddha sambandha snigdhatayä ca präptotkarñe deçe räga nämno räjïa evädhikäraù. bahis tu 'tasmäd bhärata sarvätmä' ityädi çästra pravartakatva lakñaëa-päruñyäbhäsena priyädi çuddha sambandhäbhävät svata eväti snigdhatänudayena pürvataù kiïcid apakåñöe deçe vaidha nämno’ parasya räjïaù. kleçaghnatva-çubhadatväbhyäntu präyaçuyorëa ko’pi viçeñaù.
“Like a touchstone, this creeper of bhakti eventually transforms the iron-like material nature of the senses into the most pure transcendental gold. Gradually the sädhana-bhakti creeper sprouts and unfolds two leaves. The first is called kleçaghni, destroyer of material sufferings, and the second is called çubhadä, giver of all auspiciousness. The inner surface of the two leaves is the domain of the king called räga (divine passionate devotion), and is very smooth, the sign of its being born out of spontaneous greed. It is superior due to its appearance from the pure affectionate relation with the Lord as described in the Bhägavata (3.25.38), “I am their dear one, very life, son,...” The outer surface of the leaves is ruled by another king known as vaidha (regulative devotion) and slightly rough in nature, the sign of its being born from the injunctions of the scriptures. It is somewhat inferior and slightly rough due to the lack of pure affectionate relation with the Lord. Çrémad-Bhägavata (2.1.5) says, “Therefore, persons desiring fearlessness should worship the Lord, the Supersoul.” However, both räga and vaidhé, almost equally manifest the symptoms of kleçaghni and çubhadä. “
Here it is again proven that rägänugä bhakti is, like vaidhi bhakti, a sädhana that starts from the beginning of bhakti-practise. räga is the inner leaf and vaidhi the outer.
Çréla Viçvanätha Cakravarté’s commentary on Bhakti Rasamåta Sindhu 1.2.292-
tat-tad-bhävädi-mädhurye çré-bhägavatädi-prasiddhävatära-lélä-varëanamaya-çästra-sämänye çrute çravaëa-dvärä yat kiïcid anubhüte sati yacchästraà vidhi-väkyaà näpekñate | yuktià ca na kintu pravartata evety arthaù | tad eva lobhotpatter lakñaëam anumäpakaà tädåça-hetu-jïänäd eva lobhotpattir anuméyate ity arthaù | na tv atra lakñaëaà lobhotpatteù svarüpam iti vyähyätuà çakyaà çästra-yuktäpekñäbhävasya svarüpatväbhävät
Çréla Jéva Gosvämé’s öékä of Bhakti Rasämåta Sindhu 1.2.292 - Qualification for rägänugä bhakti
8 October 27, 2013

tat-tad-bhävädi-mädhurye çré-bhägavatädiñu siddha-nirdeça-çästreñu çrute çravaëa-dvärä yat kiïcid anubhüte sati yacchästraà vidhi-väkyaà näpekñate | yuktià ca kintu pravartata evety arthaù | tad eva lobhotpatter lakñaëam iti
The meaning of both the above texts is identical - "When one has got even a slight (yat kincit) feeling for the sweet moods of Kåñëa and His devotees through hearing their descriptions in texts describing the ultimate spiritual goal, such as the Bhägavata, [the rägänugä sadhaka] no longer waits for the injunctions of scripture or for logical reasons to do so, but simply takes up [the rägänugä devotional path]. This is the characteristic of lobha."
The words yat kincit prove that initial lobha is not an all-consuming fire.
*
In his book “Çré Guru Paramparä - Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakur, Heir to the Esoteric Life of Kedaranatha Bhaktivinoda”, Tripuräri Swämi says that "in Bhakti-sära-pradarçiné (his commentary on Bhakti Rasämåta Sindhu, ed.), Viçvanätha tells us that in order to practice rägänugä bhakti one must have attained the stage of niñöhä."
Response:
rägätmikaika niñthä ye vrajaväsé janädayaù
teñäà bhäväptaye lubdho bhaved aträdhikäravän (B.R.S. 1.2.291)
is the verse referred to here. The words eka niñöha (exclusively fixed, loyal) have been mistranslated to refer to the adhikaravän, the jéva-candidate, and have confused it for the high stage of bhakti called niñöhä, but it refers instead to the nitya siddha rolemodel, the Vrajaväsés, and means 'exclusive fixation' and not the stage of niñöhä that sädhakas must go through. This is what Viçvanätha Cakravartépäda writes in his Bhakti Sära Pradarçini-commentary on this verse - rägätmika bhaktau eka niñöhäà yeñäà teñäà vrajaväsinam çré kåñëe yo bhäväs tat säjätiya bhäväptaye lubdha ityarthaù. The word-for-word translation of this commentary runs as follows: rägätmikä bhaktau = in rägätmikä bhakti (of the nitya siddha vrajaväsés, described in verse 270) eka niñöhäà = exclusively fixed. yeñäà = of them, teñäà = of exactly these same ones. vrajaväsinäà= of the Vrajaväsés. çré kåñëe = towards Çré Kåñëa. yaù = whatever. bhävaù = feelings. tat = that. säjätiya = like-minded. bhäva = feeling. äptaye = for the sake of attaining. lubdha = greedy. iti = thus. arthaù = the meaning.
Here is that definition of the rägätmikä bhakti of the nitya siddha Vrajaväsés –
viräjantém abhivyaktaà vrajaväsi-janädiñu |
rägätmikäm anusåtä yä sä rägänugocyate || (B.R.S. 1.2.270)
“The devotion which is clearly present in the associates of the Lord in Vraja is called devotion filled with loving attachment (rägätmika-bhakti), and devotion following in the wake of this rägätmikä-bhakti is called rägänugä-bhakti.” Qualification for rägänugä bhakti
9 October 27, 2013

As one desires to approach the Lord, so the Lord will approach the aspirant – ye yathä mäà prapadyante täàs tathaiva bhajämyahaà (B. Gétä 4.11) Reflecting on these famous words of the Bhagavad Gita, one can easily understand that varieties of goals are attained in accordance with one's desires. It is not that all paths lead to the same goal.
vaidhé-rägänugä-märga-bhedena parikértitaù
dvividhaù khalu bhävo’tra sädhanäbhiniveçajaù (BRS 1.3.7)
“The paths of vaidhi and rägänugä are known to be separate from each other. Engagement in these two forms of practice certainly awakens two distinct varieties of bhäva.” This automatically shows that rägänugä bhakti is not per se a post graduate phase of vaidhi bhakti. The goals of these two paths of devotion in practice are understood as follows:
vidhi-bhaktye pärñada-dehe vaikuëöhete yäy (C.C. 2.24.87)
“Through vidhi-bhakti, one will attain the form of an associate in Vaikuëöha.”
aiçvarya-jïäne vidhi-bhajana koriyä
vaikuëöhake yäya catur-vidha mukti päyä (C.C. 1.3.17)
“Those who worship according to scriptural commandments, being aware of the Lord's superhuman prowess, attain the four kinds of liberation in Vaikuntha.”
räga-bhaktye vraje svayaà-bhagaväne päy (C.C. 2.24.85)
“Through räga-bhakti, one will attain the Lord Himself in Vraja.”
rägänuga-märge täre bhaje yei jana
sei-jana päya vraje vrajendra-nandana (CC 2.8.221)
“He who worships on the path of rägänugä will attain Vrajendra-nandana (Sri Kåñëa) in Vraja.”
In the realm of Vraja, the sweet and intimate human-like pastimes of Kåñëa prevail. Only in such an atmosphere love can attain its pinnacle. Love which is filled with awareness of the Lord's almight is of an inferior quality. As stated by the Lord Himself:
sakala jagate more kore vidhi-bhakti
vidhi-bhaktye vraja-bhäva päite nähi çakti
aiçvarya-jïänete saba jagat miçrita
aiçvarya-çithila-preme nähi mora préta (C.C. 1.3.15-16)
“Everyone in this world worships Me through vidhi-bhakti. Vidhi-bhakti has Qualification for rägänugä bhakti
10 October 27, 2013

no power for attaining the feelings of Vraja. The devotion of the world is mixed with knowledge of My divine prowess.I do not delight in love diluted with prowess.”
It is thus evident that there is a need to deeply reflect on the nature and practice of rägänugä-bhakti for anyone who desires to perfect his loving faculty in relationship with God. There is no other means for tasting the ambrosial sweetness of the Vraja-pastimes of the Lord!
*
SMARANAM AND THE SIDDHA DEHA -
The siddha deha does not just come falling out of the sky, but must be formed gradually, from the point where one is pure enough to start meditating, by mental practise. In his translations of Caitanya Caritämåta (Madhya 8,229; Madhya 22, 155-158) A.C. Bhaktivedänta Svämé repeatedly suggests that to meditate on the siddha deha one needs to be ‘self-realised’, while such a word cannot be found in the original verses. Çréla Narottama däsa Öhäkura explains that meditation on the siddha deha is a sädhana:
sädhane bhävibe yähä, siddha dehe päbe tähä
räga märge ei sei upäya
"Whatever you think of during your sädhana, you will attain in your siddhi-body. Those are the ways of räga märga.(Prema Bhakti Candrikä 57)"
sädhane ye dhana cäi, siddha dehe tähä päi,
pakkäpakka mätra se vicära
"The treasure I covet during my sädhanä I will receive in my siddha body. The only difference between the two is being ripe and unripe. (Prema Bhakti Candrikä 56)"
This means that the difference between the struggling practitioner and the siddha is only in quantity and not in quality. That the siddha deha does not come from out of the blue, but must be formed through constant meditation is also confirmed in Bhagavad Géta 8,6—
yaà yaà väpi smaran bhävan tyajantyante kalevaram
taà tam evaiti kaunteya sadä tad bhäva bhävita
"Whatever one contemplates throughout life is what one attains when one leaves the body."
kéöaù peçaskåtäruddhaù kuòyäyäà tam anusmaran
saàrambha bhaya yogena vindate tat svarüpatäm Qualification for rägänugä bhakti
11 October 27, 2013

"The caterpillar imprisoned by a wasp in (its nest on) a wall, and constantly thinking of the latter through intense hate and fear, attains the form of the wasp." [Çrémad Bhägavata 7.1.27] Bhakti Rasämåta Sindhu 1.2.295—
sevä sädhaka rüpeëa siddha rüpeëa cätra hi;
tad bhäva lipsunä käryä vraja lokänusärataù
"A person who desires loving attraction to His beloved deity Çré Kåñëa in Vraja must serve in allegiance to the people of Vraja, both in the current practitioner's body as well as in the spiritual, mentally conceived body, which is fit for serving the beloved deity." Commentary by Çré Viçvanätha Cakravarté: tathäca siddha-rüpeëa mänasé sevä çré rädhä-lalitä-viçäkhä çré rüpa manjaryädénäm anusäreëa kartavyä. sädhaka rüpeëa tu käyikyädi sevä tu çré rüpa sanätanädi vrajaväsi janänäm anusäreëa kartavyetyarthaù - "Mental service must be rendered in the spiritual body in allegiance to Çré Rädhä, Lalitä and Rüpa Maïjaré and service in the current physical body must be rendered in allegiance to Vraja-people like Çré Rüpa and Sanätana."
The Bengali translation of the above çloka in 'Caitanya Caritämåta' (Madhya 22,154-155) is:
bähya antara ihära dui to sädhana;
bähya — sädhaka dehe kore çravaëa kértana
mane — nija siddha deha koriyä bhävana;
rätri dine kore vraje kåñëera sevana
"There are two kinds of devotion in practise — external and internal. In the external practitioner's body devotional practices of hearing and chanting Kåñëa's glories are performed, and internally, in the mentally conceived spiritual body, one renders mental service to Kåñëa in Vraja day and night."
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami’s translation is as follows:
SYNONYMS
bähya—externally; antara—internally; ihära—of this spontaneous love of Godhead; dui—two; ta’—indeed; sädhana—such processes of execution; bähye—externally; sädhaka-dehe—with the body of an advanced devotee; kare—does; çravaëa-kértana—hearing and chanting; mane—the mind; nija—own; siddha-deha—eternal body or self-realized position; kariyä bhävana—thinking of; rätri-dine—night and day; kare—executes; vraje—in Våndävana; kåñëera—of Lord Kåñëa; sevana—service.
TRANSLATION
“There are two processes by which one may execute this rägänugä bhakti—external and internal. When self-realized, the advanced devotee externally remains like a neophyte and executes all the çästric injunctions, especially those concerning hearing and chanting. But within his mind, in his original, purified, self-realized position, he serves Kåñëa in Våndävana in his particular way. He serves Kåñëa twenty-four hours a day, all day and night.” Qualification for rägänugä bhakti
12 October 27, 2013

Though one indeed needs to be fairly advanced to meditate on one’s siddha deha, as Jéva Gosvämé has said in Bhakti Sandarbha smaranaà tu çuddhäntaùkaraëatäm apekñate – “Smaranam requires a pure heart”, the term ‘self realised’ is a bit too extreme for a description of sädhana (this verse appears in the sädhana bhakti chapter of Bhakti Rasämåta Sindhu).
Discrepancies between A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami’s Nectar of Devotion and the teachings of the foundational äcäryas:
“Persons desiring to follow in the footsteps of such eternal devotees of the Lord as the Vṛṣṇis and Vṛndävana denizens are called rägänugä devotees, which means that they are trying to attain to the perfection of those devotees. These rägänugä devotees do not follow the regulative principles of devotional service very strictly,…”
However, Çréla Rüpa Goswämé teaches in Bhakti Rasämåta Sindhu (1.2.296) –
çravaëotkértanädéni vaidhi bhaktyuditäni tu
yänyaìgäni ca tänyatra vijïeyäni manéñibhiù
The discriminating practitioners should accept the items which were mentioned in vaidhi-bhakti such as hearing and chanting as the items of rägänugä-bhakti.”
Commentary by Viçvanätha Cakravartépäda:
çravaëotkértanädéni | guru-pädäçrayaëädéni tväkñepa-labdhäni | täni vinä vraja-lokänugatyädikaà kim api na siddhyed ity arthaù | manéñibhir iti manéñayä vimåçyaiva svéya-bhäva-samucitäny eva täni käryäëi | na tu tad-viruddhäni | täni cärcana-bhaktäv ahaìgrahopäsana-mudrä-nyäsa-dvärakä-dhyäna-rukmiëy-ädi-püjanäni ägama-çästra-vihitäny api naiva käryäëi
Along with hearing and chanting, items such as surrendering to the lotus feet of guru should be understood as favorable. Without those favorable items how can one accomplish following after the eternal inhabitants of Vraja? After considering with intelligence, one should select activities conducive to one’s own sentiments for Kåñëa, and not those activities which are contrary to one’s sentiments. Though prescribed in the scriptures, activities of deity worship such as worshipping Rukmiëé, meditation of Dvärakä, performing mudräs and nyäsas, or identifying oneself with the Lord and worshipping oneself, should be rejected.”
No äcärya mentions any other rules of vaidhi-bhakti which can be scrapped by a rägänugä devotee.
QUOTE Nectar of Devotion ch.16 - Eligibility for Spontaneous Devotional Service: Qualification for rägänugä bhakti
13 October 27, 2013

“We must always remember, however, that such eagerness to follow in the footsteps of the denizens of Vraja is not possible unless one is freed from material contamination. In following the regulative principles of devotional service, there is a stage called anartha-nivrtti, which means the disappearance of all material contamination. Sometimes someone is found imitating such devotional love, but factually he is not freed from anarthas or unwanted habits......... When one is actually spontaneously attracted to the loving principles of the gopis, there will be found no trace of any mundane contamination in him.”
Response: In his Raga-vartma-candrika (1.8) however, Visvanatha Cakravarti explains that lobha is not a black-and-white matter, that it is either absolute and complete, or there is none. Lobha is not necessarily a burning, all-consuming passion:
sa ca lobho räga vartma vartinäà bhaktänäà guru-padäçraya lakñaëam ärabhya sväbhéñöa vastu säkñät präpti samayam abhivyäpya “yathä yathätma parimåjyate’sau mat puëya gäthä çravaëäbhidhänaiù tathä tathä paçyati vastu sükñmaà cakñur yathaiväïjana samprayuktam ” iti bhagavad ukter bhakti hetukäntaù karaëa çuddhi täratamyät prati dinam adhikädhiko bhavati.
“It is described that the devotees on the räga-path gradually progress from the initial surrender to the feet of Sri Guru up to the stage of directly attaining the object of their desires. ‘When the eye is smeared with medicinal ointment, its ability of perception becomes more and more refined, and accordingly it is able to perceive more and more subtle objects; similarly, according to the degree of the mind’s having become purified by hearing and chanting of My purifying pastimes, all the subtle truths of reality become manifest in the heart of the sädhaka.’ From these words of the Lord (S.B. 11.14.26) it is known that through sädhana-bhakti the consciousness of the sädhaka becomes more purified every day, and he gradually becomes more and more greedy.”
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami: "In the stage of devotional service where regulative principles are followed, there is no necessity of discussing this love, for it must develop of itself at a more advanced stage."
Response: This is not corroborrated by Rüpa Gosvämé.
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami: “We must always remember, however, that such eagerness to follow in the footsteps of the denizens of Vraja (Våndävana) is not possible unless one is freed from material contamination. In following the regulative principles of devotional service, there is a stage called anartha-nivåtti, which means the disappearance of all material contamination. Sometimes someone is found imitating such devotional love, but factually he is not freed from anarthas, or unwanted habits. It has been seen that a so-called devotee proclaims himself a follower of Nanda, Yaçodä or the gopés, while at the same time his abominable attraction for mundane sex life is visible. Such a manifestation of divine love is mere imitation and has no value. When one is actually spontaneously attracted to the loving principles of the gopés, there will be found no trace of any mundane contamination in his character. Qualification for rägänugä bhakti
14 October 27, 2013

Therefore, in the beginning, everyone should strictly follow the regulative principles of devotional service, according to the injunctions of the scriptures and the spiritual master. Only after the stage of liberation from material contamination can one actually aspire to follow in the footsteps of the devotees in Våndävana.”
Response: Rüpa Gosvämé teaches: vaidhi rägänugä ceti sa dvidha sädhanäbhidha (Bhakti Rasämåta Sindhu 1.2.5) - there are two kinds of sädhana (after first explaining that sädhana bhakti means practise with the senses, by souls that are still conditioned)— vaidhi and rägänugä, and nowhere it is said that rägänugä bhakti is a post graduate state of vaidhi bhakti. Çré Viçvanatha Cakravarti states in his Räga Vartma Candrikä (2.7) -
atha rägänugä-bhakti - majjanasyänartha-nivåtti-niñöhä-rucy-äsakty-antaram prema-bhümikärüòhasya säkñät sväbhéñöa-präpti-prakaraù pradarçyate
“Then it will be described how the one, who has progressed on the path of rägänugä-bhakti through the cessation of the evils (anartha-nivåtti), firmness (niñöha), taste (ruci), and attachment (äsakti) all the way to the attainment of ecstatic love (prema), will directly come to attain his desired object.”
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami: “In this connection, we should be careful about the so-called siddha-praëäli. The siddha-praëäli process is followed by a class of men who are not very authorized and who have manufactured their own way of devotional service.”
Response: That will include Bhaktivinoda Thakur, whom A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami himself has made world-famous as an äcärya? Bhaktivinoda preaches siddha-praëälé in his books Hari-näma cintämaëi, Bhajan Rahasya and Jaiva-dharma.
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami: “They imagine that they have become associates of the Lord simply by thinking of themselves like that.”
Response: Yet, this is what the äcäryas say:
Çréla Jéva Gosvämé in Bhakti Sandarbha (286) –
tatra bhüta-çuddhir nijäbhilañita bhagavat sevaupayogika tat pärñada deha bhävanä –
"Bhüta çuddhi means that one meditates on one's own desired siddha deha which is fit for serving the Lord".
Kåñëadäs Kaviräja in Caitanya Caritämåta - mone nija siddha deha koriyä bhävan, 'Think of your own desired siddha deha as a sädhana (ei sädhana bhakti dui to prakära, Madhya 22.155-6)
Rüpa Gosvämé in that very same Nectar of Devotion – siddha rüpena cätra hi - “Serve in the siddha deha also”, Bhakti Rasämåta Sindhu 1.2.295,
plus this verse’s öékäs by Jéva Gosvämé and Viçvanätha Cakravarté – siddha-rüpeëa antaç cintitäbhéñöa tat sevopayogi dehena – “With the siddha deha” means serving in a mentally conceived body which is fit for service.” Qualification for rägänugä bhakti
15 October 27, 2013

Narottama däs Thäkur – sädhane bhävibe yähä, siddha deha päbe tähä (Premabhakti Candrikä) – “Whatever siddha deha one thinks of during one’s sädhana is what one attains in siddha stage.”
Kåñëadäs Kaviräja’s Säraìga Rangadä öékä of Kåñëa Karëämåta (3):
rägänugä märge anutpanna rati sädhaka bhaktair api svepsita siddha dehaà manasi parikalpya - 'On the rägänugä-path even a sädhaka bhakta who has no rati yet can think of his own desired siddha deha."
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami: “This external behavior is not at all according to the regulative principles. The so-called siddha-praëäli process is followed by the präkåta-sahajiya, a pseudo sect of so-called Vaiñëavas. In the opinion of Rüpa Gosvämé, such activities are simply disturbances to the standard way of devotional service.”
Response:
1] Where does Rupa Gosvami say this in Bhakti Rasamrita Sindhu?
2] Bhaktivinoda Thäkur, who elaborately preached siddha praëälé, is a pseudo Vaiñëava called präkrita sahajiya? Why some then call him the 7th Gosvämé?
In his writings, Swäméjé persistently presents a vaidhi bhakta as a neophyte and a räga bhakta as an advanced devotee. He explains the two-fold division of sädhana into vaidhi and rägänugä as follows (Nectar of Devotion, chapter 2):
“Now this sadhana-bhakti, or practice of devotional service, may also be divided into two parts. The first part is called service according to regulative principles: one has to follow these different regulative principles by the order of the spiritual master or on the strength of authoritative scriptures, and there can be no question of refusal. That is called vaidhi, or regulated. One has to do it without argument. Another part of sadhana-bhakti is called raganuga. Raganuga refers to the point at which, by following the regulative principles, one becomes a little more attached to Krsna and executes devotional service out of natural love. For example, a person engaged in devotional service may be ordered to rise early in the morning and offer arati, which is a form of Deity worship. In the beginning, by the order of his spiritual master, one rises early in the morning and offers arati, but then he develops real attachment. When he gets this attachment, he automatically tries to decorate the Deity and prepare different kinds of dresses and thinks of different plans to execute his devotional service nicely. Although it is within the category of practice, this offering of loving service is spontaneous.”
Response: Following such reasoning, the siddha-associates of Lord Viñëu in Vaikuntha, who are vaidhi bhaktas, would have to be woken up for mangalärati? This argument shows that räga bhakti is not to be translated or presented as 'spontaneous devotion' because the siddha vaidhi bhaktas in Vaikuëöha surely need not be prodded into their service. Qualification for rägänugä bhakti
16 October 27, 2013

Swäméjé comments on Çrémad Bhägavatam 3.5.4:
“...The bhakti process, as performed under the regulative principles of vaidhi-bhakti, or devotional service following the prescribed rules and regulations, is defined by the revealed scriptures and confirmed by great acaryas. This practice can help the neophyte devotee to rise to the stage of raga-bhakti, in which the Lord responds from within as the caitya-guru, or the spiritual master as Superconsciousness.”
Response: Here again Swämiji suggests that räga bhakti is some kind of post-graduate stage of vaidhi bhakti. That would mean that accomplished vaidhi bhaktas like Prahläda, Bhéñma and Närada did not have communion with the caitya guru or Supersoul?
Concluding: Both the vaidhi-sädhaka and the rägänugä-sädhaka pass through the various stages delineated in the ädau çraddhah-verses on their respective paths. Vaidhi-sädhana and rägänugä-sädhana are not two subsequent stages of one path, but two different paths leading to separate goals.
Further discussions on rägänugä bhakti:
Bhakta: "Some say that it is more humble to become a servant of Mother Yaçodä at a respectful distance than to be right up front as a manjari with Rädhä-Kåñëa."
Advaitadas: 'No one can reach the spiritual sky without being totally humble. If there is any pride left you can simply not enter into that realm, be it as a manjaré, servant of Mother Yaçodä, associate of Lord Näräyaëa or what have you. This suggestion is a purely artificial, mental construction which is not at all based on rasa vicära, lobha (devotional greed) or on any äcärya's teaching. Manjaré bhäva is superior in flavour or quality but not in quantity. In quality there are 4 kinds of flavours - däsya, sakhya, vätsalya and mädhurya, in quantity there is but one - full surrender. Maïjaré bhäva is based on sheer attraction and not on ambition or pride. Manjarés are neither more proud nor more humble than mother Yaçodä's servants. That is not the point of manjaré bhäva. The siddhänta of 'the more surrender, the higher the rasa" is a myth.”
Bhakta: "What about Vaikuëöha as a stopover to Goloka? Can one get further promotion to Goloka after first attaining Vaikuëöha?"
Advaitadas: "Bhakti Rasämåta Sindhu and Caitanya Caritämåta speak of two parallel paths, that have different symptoms of progress (bhäva, prema) and different final destinations - vaidhi bhakti leads to Vaikuëöha and räga bhakti leads to Vraja. (See quotes on page 9) Gopa-kumära's progressive course in Båhad Bhägavatämåta does not apply to regular sädhakas. He is widely regarded as a model rather than a prototype sädhaka. In Caitanya Caritämåta, Madhya lélä, chapter 14, there was a Qualification for rägänugä bhakti
17 October 27, 2013

debate between Çréväsa Pandit, who fought the corner of the aiçvarya-vision, and Svarüpa Dämodara, who fought the mädhurya-corner. That debate was unsolved - Çréväsa was not converted. Muräri Gupta and Vallabha were Räm-bhaktas and none other than Mahäprabhu Himself and Rüpa-Sanätana preached to them to become Kåñëa-bhaktas, but they were not converted either. It was simply their sthäyi bhäva. If Vaikuëöha is a stopover, where is there a question of sthäyi-bhäva then?"
Bhakta: "Why it always has to be manjari bhäva, why not gopa bhäva (serving Kåñëa as a cowherd boy) or so?"
Advaitadas:
1. "The fact that there are elaborate systems of sädhana and entire societies built up around manjaré bhäva, and none (that I know) around gopa bhäva (of which there is very scant scriptural description and virtually no social support on the ground) should not be seen as coincidence, but a clear sign that Mahäprabhu really wants us to practise this (manjaré bhäva)."
2. The entire Gauòéya Vaiñëava Sampradäya is initiated into the käma gäyatré, which is a mantra worshiping Kåñëa as the transcendental youthful Cupid (Madana Gopäla) of Vraja - that is wholly incompatible with loving Kåñëa as a child or a friend, is it not? Is any Gauòéya Vaiñëava initiated with a mantra worshipping Kåñëa as a child or a friend?
3. The entire Gauòéya Vaiñëava Sampradäya sings the Gurvañöakam by Çrépäda Viçvanätha Cakravarté, in which he clearly depicts Gurudeva as an assistant of the gopés to perfect the amorous pastimes of Çré-Çré Rädhä-Kåñëa - nikuïja yunoù rati-keli siddhyaiù yä yälibhir yuktir apekñaëéya
4. In that same Gurvañöakam, Çré Viçvanätha Cakravarté describes how the Guru is always eager to relish the endless sweetness of the pastimes, attributes, forms and names of Çré Rädhikä and Mädhava, not of Kåñëa with the cowherd boys or His parents - çré rädhikä mädhavayor apära mädhurya lélä guëa rüpa nämnäm pratikñaëäsvädana lolupasya…”
Bhakta 2: We see in Caitanya Caritämåta that Çréla Kåñëa däsa Kaviräja Goswämépäda has written, cäri bhäva diyä prabhu näcäimu jagate, that Çréman Mahäprabhu has given four bhävas, cära-vidha braja-bhäva, and with these He has made the world dance. And you say Mahäprabhu really wants us to practise this manjaré bhäva, can you comment please?
Advaitadas:
1. Yes, in principle these four bhävas are given, but practically you see huge systems having been built around manjari bhäva (Guöikä, siddha praëälé, yogapéöha, maps, what have you) whereas none of these things are in place for practising gopa bhäva anywhere (to my knowledge).
2. The Gauòéya Vaiñëava-scriptures are predominantly about mädhurya rasa, to the extent that Rüpa Gosvämé, when coming to that subject in Bhakti Rasämåta Qualification for rägänugä bhakti
18 October 27, 2013

Sindhu, cut it short and referred to an entire separate book he was to write about it, Ujjvala Nélamaëi, which is about as big as the Bhakti Rasämåta Sindhu itself.

3. The opening verse of Caitanya Caritämåta (also composed by Rüpa Gosvämé), anarpita carià cirät karuëayä avatérëa kalau samarpayitum unnatojjvala sva bhakti çriyam reveals the predominance of mädhurya rasa (unnata ujjvala rasa).”