Friday, September 12, 2014

Gaurkisora dasa Babaji never gave diksa to Bhaktisiddhanta

Download this in PDF format here:


DID BHAKTISIDDHANTA SARASVATI RECEIVED DHIKSA
FROM GAURKISORA DASA BABAJI ?
by
Madhavanada das
2002
Let me make it very clear that I am not interested in an intense back-and-forth knee-jerk
stubborn quarrel over anything mentioned in the thread topic title. I am also not trying to
convert anyone to anything, just in case somebody was going to say that. I am interested
in the historical facts surrounding the initiation of Bhaktisiddhanta. I trust our intelligent
audience can understand this.
Here are my notes on the subject matter of the initiation of Bhaktisiddhanta:
a) Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati was in the habit of visiting Ramakrishna Dasa Pandita
Babaji during his visits to Vrindavana since he was without a doubt one of the most
40
respected of the Gaudiya Vaishnavas of the 1920s and 1930s. On one occasion Sarasvati
was highly praising Gaura Kishora Babaji in Pandita Baba's presence. Pandita Baba asked
him if he had re-ceived initiation from him. Sarasvati said he had received it in a dream.
Pandita Babaji said that that was fine, but he should receive it in the flesh since that is the
only type of initiation accepted in the Caitanya tradition. Bhaktisiddhanta said he would
and ended the visit. Years later Sarasvati returned to Vrindavana as the acarya of the
Gaudiya Matha, a famous man. He visited Pandita Babaji and was asked again if he
had gotten initiation from Gaura Kishora Dasa Baba. His answer was the same, at which
point Pandita Baba got extremely angry with him for making disciples without proper
initiation. This incident was witnessed by Sri Kisori Mohana Gosvami, Sri Kisori Dasa
Babaji and Advaita Dasa Babaji of Govardhan.
b) There is no indication of Sarasvati's being initiated by Babaji Maharaja in any of his
objective biographies, objective meaning compiled by anyone who would not be bound
out of prejudice to accept the statement of Sarasvati, being a follower of his. The brother
of Sarasvati, Lalita Prasada Thakura, denies Sarasvati's receiving diksa from Babaji
Maharaja. The pujari and other residents of Gaura Kisora Dasa Babaji's bhajana kutira
knew of only four disciples of Babaji, but Sarasvati was not among them.
c) Sarasvati did not reveal the parampara of Gaura Kisora Dasa Babaji to his followers.
In fact, even the name of Babaji Maharaja´s diksa-guru was not revealed by Sarasvati.
Now, why would a disciple not reveal the diksa-parampara of his guru? It is a common
practice that at the time of diksa the guru reveals his guru-pranali, or the succession of
gurus back to the time of Sriman Mahaprabhu and His associates.
d) According to Hari Bhakti Vilasa (2.8.5), at the time of diksa the guru bestows the
specific sectarian signs he carries unto the disciple: sampradayika mudradi bhusitam tam
krtanjalim In his commentary on this verse, Sri Sanatana Gosvami explains:
sampradayikam guru-paramparasiddham, "This sampradayika refers to the guruparampara,"
and mudra tilaka maladi, "And mudra refers to tilaka and strings of beads."
Consequently the recognized parivaras, like Nityananda-parivara, Advaita-parivara,
Narottama-parivara and Syamananda-parivara, have their specific tilaka-svarupa. If
Sarasvati received diksa, why is it that he and his followers have adopted a tilaka which
was not worn by his diksa-guru, who must have at the time of diksa given a specific tilakasvarupa
to Sarasvati?
e) Wherefrom did Sarasvati receive the sacred thread and the brahmagayatri, which he
passed on to his disciples? Certainly not from Gaura Kisora Dasa Babaji, who was a
vaisya by birth, and did not chant the brahma-gayatri, nor wear a sacred thread.
f) What is the origin of the specific set of mantras given in the line of Sarasvati? Hari
Bhakti Vilasa mentions Gopala Mantra and Kama-gayatri as diksa-mantras. The
paddhatis of Gopala Guru and Dhyanacandra give an elaborate list of mantras for
41
raganuga-sadhana, but the guru-mantra
and guru-gayatri given by Sarasvati are different from the ones given in these paddhatis.
Then let us turn to some of the source material I have at hand. I find the following
statement of Bhakti Vikash Swami of ISKCON, who is compiling a biography on
Bhaktisiddhanta, very interresting:
In 1932 Visvambharananda dasa Babaji, on behalf of many babajis and caste Goswamis
in Vrndavana, published a book opposing Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati and his Mission,
citing extensively from sastra to support his arguments. He challenged that the line of
parampara traced from Jagannatha dasa Babaji through Bhaktivinoda Thakura to Gaura
Kisora dasa Babaji and then to Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati was unauthorized.
Visvambharananda claimed that although Sarasvati Thakura was supposed to be the
disciple of Gaura Kisora dasa Babaji, he was disqualified in several ways. First, Sarasvati
Thakura did not accept as bona fide the recognized lineage of Gaura Kisora dasa Babaji,
whose guru was in the Advaita-parivara. Furthermore, since Gaura Kisora dasa Babaji
had never used a japa-mala, and had not given one to Sarasvati Thakura at the time of
initiation but had simply placed some Navadvipa dust into his hand, Visvambharananda
argued that such an initiation was not bona fide. The implication was that Sarasvati
Thakura had not actually received pancaratrika-diksa from Gaura Kisora dasa Babaji, so
how could he confer it upon others? Nor had Gaura Kisora dasa Babaji worn a brahmana
thread, so on what authority did Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati wear one? Moreover,
Visvambharananda argued, Sarasvati Thakura claimed to be a follower of Bhaktivinoda
Thakura, who was initiated by the caste Goswami Bipina Bihari. Why then did
Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati not accept guru-parampara by seminal descent? Bhaktivinoda
Thakura had given him a Nrsimha mantra for worshiping the Deity, yet Sarasvati
Thakura was giving a Radha-Krsna mantra for this purpose. Wherefrom did he derive
this mantra, and on whose authority did he distribute it? Visvambharananda further
objected that since Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati was a sannyasi without a sannyasa guru,
how could he give sannyasa to others? Sarasvati Thakura responded by explaining the
concept of bhagavataparampara, or siksa-parampara. He maintained that the essence of
parampara lies in the transmission of transcendental knowledge, not merely in a list of
contiguous names. The life of the parampara is maintained by the maha-bhagavatas, who
embody the essence of scriptural knowledge. Therefore, to trace the parampara through
such maha-bhagavatas truly represents parampara. He said, "Bhaktivinoda Thakura is
Kamala Manjari, a personal associate of Radharani. He ordered me to establish daivavarnasrama.
I must obey his order. The acarya is not under the sastra. The acarya can
make sastra. Bhaktivinoda Thakura, the acarya, has inspired me in various ways. By his
mercy and that of Gaura Kisora dasa Babaji Maharaja and the previous acaryas we are
going on, not caring for the precise technicalities of smartas. "Although this concept of
bhagavata-parampara appears to be new, it is based on the essential understanding of the
scriptures. Something new given by an acarya but based on sastra is called vaisistya
(a special characteristic). Acaryas Ramanuja and Madhva both apparently introduced
42
something new, but because their teachings were based on sastra they came to be
accepted. Phalena pariciyate: 'An action should be understood by its result.' My
commitment to devotional service and my preaching activities speak for themselves. Owllike
persons cannot see this, but those who are honest will accept it." Bhakti Vikash
Maharaj relates, "It [the quote from BSST] is almost certainly not verbatim, especially as
it was originally spoken or written in Bengali. It is as told to me by the late Jati Shekhar
Prabhu, a disciple of SBST."
I find it significant that even an insider will admit that a traditional pancaratrika-diksa most
likely never took place, although a kind of initiation was there, which they experience as
sufficient.
The following statement is given in a biography, compiled by Bhakti Kusum Sraman
Maharaja:
"With the permission of Srila Bhaktivinode Thakura, Srila Sarasvati Thakura accepted
Bhagavati initiation from Srila Babaji Maharaja in the month of Magha (January-
February) 1900 A.D."
It is unknown to me what the "Bhagavati initiation" means. Perhaps it means a kind of
informal initiation, in the spirit of "Bhagavata parampara". The BBT printing of Brahma
Samhita states:
"In 1905, following the advice of his father, Siddhanta Saraswati accepted spiritual
initiation from Gaurakisora dasa Babaji."
It is obvious that the authority of this statement is questionable, given the five-year error in
the date compared to the Gaudiya Matha edition, which I recall draws the time from
Bhaktisiddhanta's own writings in "The Harmonist".
Then I have some accounts related by Nitai Das on record, from the time when he began
to study the issue:
The eyewitnesses I know of and from whom I heard were eyewitness to Bhaktisiddhanta's
admission before Pandita Ramakrsna Das Baba that he had not received initiation from
Gaura Kishora Das Babaji.
Bhaktisiddhanta was in the habit of visiting Pandita Babaji during his visits to Vrindaban
since he was without a doubt the most respected of the Caitanya Vaishnavas of the 1920s
and 1930s. On one occasion Bhaktisiddhanta was highly praising Gaura Kishora Das in
Pandita Baba's presence. Pandita Baba asked him if he had received initiation from him.
Bhaktisiddhanta said he had received it in a dream. Pandita Babaji said that that was fine,
but he should receive it in the flesh since that is the only type of initiation accepted in the
Caitanya tradition. Bhaktisiddhanta said he would and ended the visit. A few years later
Siddhanta returned to Vrindaban, now the acharya of the Gaudiya Math, a famous man.
He visited Pandita Babaji and was asked again if he had gotten initiation from Gaura
43
Kishora Das Baba. His answer was the same, at which point Pandita Baba got extremely
angry with him for making disciples without proper initiation. Pandita Babaji threw him
out of the ashrama and Bhaktisiddhanta, fearing damage to his reputation, began his
calumny of the Vrindaban babas and forbade his disciples from associating with them.
This account was given to me by Advaita Das Baba (I'm unsure if this is the correct name
of this baba after all these years) in Govardhan who said he was witness to the admission.
. . . . . . . . . .
In addition, I did a little research on my own. During one of my visits to Nabadwip I
visited the bhajana kutir/mandira of Gaura Kishora Das Babaji and spoke with the pujari
there. I asked him if he knew whether Gaura Kishora Das Babaji had any initiated
disciples. His answer, after consulting with some of the other elders of the compound,
was that, as far as he knew, there were only four, a married couple of modest means and
two others, agriculturalists, none of whom were Bhaktisiddhanta. How he knew this and
how reliable his testimony is, I don't know. The diksa-connection between
Bhaktisiddhanta and Gaura Kishor Dasa Babaji was also denied by Sri Lalita Prasad
Thakur, his brother, who certainly was around and well informed of the incidents
surrounding Bhaktisiddhanta. He also expressed how Bhaktivinoda was dissatisfied with
Bhaktisiddhanta's attitude towards Vipin Vihari Gosvami and several other senior
Vaishnavas, and therefore refused to personally initiate Bhaktisiddhanta, despite
bestowing pancaratrika-diksa and siddha-pranali to Lalita Prasad and some other
disciples of his.
The following statement was given by a western sannyasi of the Gaudiya Matha:
"There were witnesses to the initiation. Because there was a witness to the initiation of
Saraswati Thakura, even after 100 years the opposition has not been able to make much
of that rumor. Now of course the witness is also dead, but one of his relatives still lives in
Vrindavana and knows something of the event."
I would tend to conclude based on the considerations above that Bhaktisiddhanta did not
receive pancaratrika-diksa as it appears in the Hari Bhakti Vilasa, though there certainly
was a kind of guru-disciple relationship between him and Gaura Kisora Babaji, and some
kind of event of acceptance of disciplehood may have taken place. The crucial question at

hand is whether diksa-mantras were given.

Sunday, September 7, 2014

Sannyasa is bogus for real Gaudiya Vaisnavas

Download this in PDF format here:


GAUDIA VAISNAVA DHARMA
AND
SANNYASA
by
Dr. Radhagovinda Nath
(From the Appendix to his edition of the
Caitanya-caritamrta of Krsnadasa Kaviraja)
translation by
Neal Delmonico (Nitai Das)
Some people ask about the place of the institution of sannyasa (formal renunciation) in
the religious tradition of Gaudiya Vaisnavism. Therefore, a little reflection on this topic
will be done here. In what condition is taking sannyasa appropriate? That is the first thing
that should be considered. The Maitreyi Upanisad says:
yada manasi vairgyam jatam sarvesu vastusu |
tadaiva sannyased vidvan anyatha patito bhaved ||(2.19)
"When detachment to all things is born in the mind, then one should renounce.
Otherwise one would become fallen."
That Upanisad also says:
dravyartham anna-vastrrtham yah pratiharthameva va |
sannyased ubhaya-bhrastah sa muktim naptum arhati || (2.20)
"For things, for food and clothing, or for power, one who renounces for any of those
things is fallen both now and in the future and does not deserve liberation."
But Mahaprabhu himself has said that in the Age of Kali there is no prescription for
sannyasa citing as evidence the Brahma-vaivarta Purana:
asvamedham gavlambham sannyasam palapaitrikam |
devarena sutotpattim kalau pañca vivarjayet || (1.17.7)
"The asvamedha sacrifice, cow-killing (in the Madhuparka rite), renunciation, offering
meat to the forefathers (?), begetting sons by means of the husband's younger brother;
these five are to be rejected in the Age of Kali."
36
From this it is understood that even for one who has the qualification specified in the
sruti cited above sannyasa is not recommended in the Age of Kali.
In Varanasa, after listening to the primary meaning of the Vedanta-sutra from
Mahaprabhu at the house of the Maharastrian brahmana, one of Prakasnanda Sarasvati's
chief disciples sitting in the ashram thinking about the Lord's explanation of Vedanta
said:
"I consider the statements
of Sri Krsnacaitanya
to be completely true.
In the Age of Kali
we do not overcome
the cycle of rebirth by sannyasa." (C.c., Madhya, 25.27)
From this, too, it is understood that in the Age of Kali sannyasa is without utility.
What has been said above, however, is only the general rule. Let us see whether there is
any specific rule mentioned in the statements of Mahaprabhu or not.
In Varanasi, in the context of describing "that which is to be conveyed" (abhidheya-tattva,
ie. bhakti) to Sanatana Gosvamin, on the topic the behavior of Vaisnavas, Sri
Mahaprabhu said:
Giving up association with the unholy,
this is the practice of Vaisnavas.
One who associates with women is one;
the other is the unholy non-devotee of Krsna.
Rejecting all these and varnasrama-dharma,
without possessions one should find
one's only shelter in Krsna. (C.c., Madhya, 22.49-50)
This instruction of Mahaprabhu is about the rejection of varnasrama-dharma for
Vaisnavas. Varnasrama-dharma means the caste system and system of stages of life. In
scripture is found the prescription for four stages of life – the student stage of celibacy,
the householder stage of marriage, the stage of the hermit, and the stage of renunciation
(sannyasa). Renunciation is the fourth stage of life. For those who practice the path of
bhakti, Mahaprabhu has said that this (sannyasa) is also to be rejected. Rejection of the
system of castes and stages is counted as one of the
practices of Vaisnavas.
In the context of the sixty-four limbs of bhakti as means (sadhana-bhakti), the Lord has
37
not given any instruction for sannyasa. Instead he has said: "knowledge and renunciation
are never parts of bhakti." (C.c., Madhya, 22.82)
The Gosvamin headed by Rupa, who follow the footsteps of Sri Mahaprabhu, have
established the example of worship in the Vaisnava tradition and have published books,
such as the Bhakti-rasamrta-sindhu showing the path of worship. In their books, an
instruction for the practice of sannyasa is not found anywhere. Also, none of them took
sannyasa. They only wore the cloth of those without possessions (niskiñcana). Sri
Sanatana Gosvamin received one piece of an old cloth from Tapana Misra at Varanasi
and with that made a kaupin and outer cloth. This is the dress of one without possessions.
When Sri Jagadananda went to Vrindaban, he one day invited Sanatana Gosvamin for
food. A sannyasi by the name of Mukunda Sarasvati gave Sanatana an outer cloth.
Sanatana tied that outer cloth on his head and went to keep
Jagadananda's invitation. Then:
Seeing the reddish cloth, the Pandita
became overwhelmed with love.
Thinking it the remnant of
Mahaprabhu, he questioned him:
"Where did you get this reddish cloth?"
"Mukunda Sarasvati gave it," replied Sanatana.
Hearing that, sadness arose in the Pandita's mind.
Taking up the rice pot, he came to hit him. (C.c., Antya.13.51-53)
Sanatana was embarrassed. Seeing that, Jagadananda Pandita placed the pot on the stove
and said to Sanatana:
You are the chief of the associates of Mahaprabhu;
There is no other as dear to Mahaprabhu as you.
You wear another sannyasi's cloth on your head.
When something like this happens, how can one tolerate it?
(C.c., Antya, 13.55-6)
Then Sanatana said:
Right! Pandita Mahasaya!
No one is as dear to Caitanya as you.
This kind of unwavering faith in Caitanya is suitable in you.
If you did not show me, how would I learn this?
To see that, this cloth was tied on my head;
Unprecedented love have I seen before my very eyes.
38
It is not fitting for a Vaisnava to wear reddish cloth.
I will give it to some visitor; what need have I with it?
(C.c., Antya, 13. 57-60)
Here Sanatana has said: "It is not fitting for a Vaisnava to wear reddish cloth." Here this
is not a reddened cloth or a red-colored cloth. This is the color of cloth that Mahaprabhu
used as an outer cloth (saffron), because Jagadananda Pandita mistook it for a remnant
of Mahaprabhu. This was the outer cloth of a sannyasi named Mukunda Sarasvati. This
was the color of cloth that sannyasis used as outer cloths. Reddened (rakta) means dyed
or colored cloth. From Sri Sanatana's statement it is understood that far from taking
sannyasa, Vaisnavas should not even wear cloth colored like that of sannyasis. Someone is
perhaps able to say that the Ramanuja Sampradya or the Madhva Sampradaya is
Vaisnava, but in these communities sannyasi are found. In answer to this it is said that the
practices of each community of practitioners is in accordance with attainment of that
community's desired goals. The objective of the Ramanuja Sampradaya or of the Madhva
Sampradaya is not the same as that of the Gaudiya Sampradaya. The object of worship of
those two communities is the Lord of the Supreme Heaven, Narayana; the object of
worship of the Gaudiya community is Sri Krsna, the son of leader of Vraja in Vraja. The
mood of those two communities is the mood of godliness in Vaikuntha; the mood of the
Gaudiya community is the mood of pure sweetness free of knowledge of godliness in
Vraja. The desired objective of those two communities is the liberations headed by
sharing of a world (salokya), etc.; the desired objective of the Gaudiya community is
service (seva) whose purpose is only the happiness of Krsna in Vraja. Desire for
liberation is contrary to the mood of the Gaudiya community, contrary to worship
(bhajana). For this community:
Obstacles to Krsna-bhakti
are all auspicious and inauspicious works.
That is one living being's
trait of the darkness of ignorance. (C.c., Adi, 1.52)
The darkness of ignorance
is called the fraudulent (kaitava):
All desire for piety, wealth,
sensuality, liberation, and so forth. (C.c, Adi, 1.50)
The Bhagavata's "highest religion free from fraud" is the religion to be practiced by the
Gaudiya community. The observance of varnasrama-dharma is favorable to the
attainment of the liberations headed by sharing a world. For this reason, those who desire
liberation observe varnasrama-dharma.
The Tattvavadi teacher who followed Sri Madhvacarya said to Mahaprabhu in connection
with his community's means and goal:
39
Offering varnasrama-dharma to Krsna,
this is the highest means for the devotee of Krsna.
Attaining the five kinds of liberation and going to Vaikuntha,
this is the highest objective according to scripture.
(C.c., Madhya, 9.238-9)
Sri Ramanujacarya, too, in his commentary on the Brahma-sutra and on the Gita has
talked about the observance of varnasrama-dharma.
Previously it was said that sannyasa is a part of varnasrama-dharma. Since the Ramanuja
community and the Madhva community, both desirous of liberation, observe varnasramadharma,
taking sannyasa is not prohibited for them. This for them is a specific rule. But
the Gaudiya community is not desirous of liberation; varnasrama-dharma and the
sannyasa that is included in it is not suitable to their form of worship. The sannyasa that
is found in Vedic scriptures is the sannyasa of varnasrama-dharma. Other forms of
sannyasa are not found in Vedic scriptures. The sannyasa that was started in the Buddhist
community, which is inimical to the Vedas, is not the sannyasa that is approved by the
Vedic scriptures. The community of sannyasi of ten names was started by Sri
Sankaracarya, to many in imitation of the Buddhists. Whether the titles of the ten-named
sannyasi, Giri, Puri, Vana, Bharati, and so forth, were in use among the sannyasi who
followed the Vedic scriptures is not known. In later times many accepted the form of
sannyasa in imitation of Sri Sankara, but did not take the titles of the Sankara tradition.
Whether their sannyasa is the sannyasa endorsed by the Vedic scriptures or not is a

subject for the consideration of scholars.

Wednesday, September 3, 2014

Escape from the Hall of Mirrors (ISKCON) by Nitai Das, Parts 1 and 2

Download this in PDF format here:


ESCAPE FROM THE HALL OF MIRRORS
Part 1
Nitai Das
2005
In the last issue, I said I would describe my departure from ISKCON and some of my
experiences both before and after leaving. The beginning of the end occurred when Dr.
Kapoor dropped his bombshell on me, informing me that Bhaktisiddhanta was not
properly initiated. When, after several days, the shock finally subsided somewhat, I began
to consider my options. I had by then left Prabhupad’s traveling entourage where I had
for almost three years been the Sanskrit editor, and had settled in Vrindaban. In
addition, I was then serving as the head pujari for the Krishna-Balarama Mandir. Krishna
and Balarama are particularly beautiful images and it was a great pleasure to serve them.
I got to live in a nice room in the new guest house, eat good prasada, teach some of the
evening classes, attempt to educate the Gurukula kids in Sanskrit, and take my two-hour
turns in the twenty-four hour kirtan.
I was a respected, senior member of the community. Living in Vrindaban was great for
someone with even a little facility with the languages. In the afternoons, when the rest of
the bhaktas were coming out of their siestas, I would occasionally sneak out and attend a
class on the Harinamamrta-vyakarana, the Sanskrit grammar composed entirely of the
names of Krsna written by Sri Jiva Goswami, at Haridas Shastri’s ashrama not far from
the temple. Haridasa Shastri was a wonderfully learned Vaisnava with nine tirthas after
his name, each tirtha representing an above average expertise in an area of Sanskrit
philosophy and literature. A Bengali educated in the traditional system (the Pathsala or
Tol system) in Benares, he apparently had assisted Krsnadas Baba of Kusumasarovara in
his efforts to edit and publish all of the major works of the Gaudiya tradition. He had also
been a siksa disciple of the great Vaisnava scholar and saint, Pandit Ramkrishna Das
Baba. At the time that I began attending his classed he was engaged in reprinting all of
the works previously published by Krsnadas Baba and some others besides. In the
afternoon, he offered free classes on any of the Goswami works to anyone who showed
up. There were usually a half a dozen men young and old, probably from various
surrounding ashramas, there to study with him. Unfortunately, my Hindi and Bengali
27
were not at that time strong enough for me to make much of his detailed explanations of
the text, so I was an infrequent student.
Occasionally I succeeded in sneaking out in the evenings, usually when someone boring
like the then temple president, Aksayananda Maharaja, or some other foolish visiting
sannyasi gave the evening lecture. Instead I went to hear the enthralling Nrsimha
Vallabha Goswami read and elaborate one of Visvanatha Cakravartin’s short poems. His
lectures were then being given in the Radhadamodara Temple. There I sat among the
white-clad little old ladies and men listening as the great Goswami teased out the rasa of
every line, sometimes of every word, of Visvanatha’s beautiful Prema-samputa. His
language, though Bengali, was so Sanskritic that even I could follow it. What a master! I
will never forget how on one particular evening, in a particularly emotionally charged
part of the text, I heard a loud honk and a thud a couple of rows behind me. A bhakta
had keeled over in a faint and one of the neighboring ladies was fanning him. Goswami
looked up, paused for a bit to be sure that the man was alright or at least being cared for,
and then continued reading. Such eruptions of bhava were not uncommon at the readings
in Vrindaban and they happened fairly frequently in Nrisimha Vallabha’s readings. All in
all things were pretty good. The place was brimming with interesting people and it was
Vrindaban.
Still, I could not get past the disappointment. I felt like I had been scammed. It was as if I
had been sold something very valuable and suddenly it turned out to be a fake. All those
years we had been told, and in turn told others, that ISKCON was the only real
descendent of the religious movement of Sri Caitanya, and that turned out to be a lie. I
had given up everything and devoted myself to following and serving Prabhupad in
whatever way I was able. My family had cut itself off from me and I from it; my father had
even pronounced me dead; and for what? I really felt cheated and angry. I decided that I
had come too far to give up then, and besides, although living in Vrindaban was
wonderful, there were some irritants that came along with living in the ISKCON complex.
I had developed a desire to chant 64 rounds of Hari-nama and it was hard to find time to
do that in the temple context, especially in a culture that did not value such practices. I
was constantly subjected to suspicion because of that and because of my excursions into
the town in the evening to hear readings. Eventually, I was told that I was no longer
allowed to visit the town in the evenings. Worse, however, was the sense of spinning my
wheels that I felt at the Krsna-Balarama temple. I had the feeling that none of us were
making any advancement. There was something corrupt and corrupting in the
atmosphere and I couldn’t quite put my finger on what it was. I could tell a couple of
stories that would illustrate this corruption, but that would carry us too far afield. Suffice
it to say that I felt a disease while staying there.
The next time I visited Dr. Kapoor I expressed a desire to get properly initiated. I may
have even asked him if he would initiate me. He had already told of his emotional
meeting with Gauranga Das Baba. He politely declined and recommended instead, and
28
in extraordinary terms, a baba who lived way out in the bush, He said this baba was a
siddha-mahapurus. a, a great one who had realized Krsna-preman, one of only a few alive
in the holy abode at that time. Dr. Kapoor said that this baba was known by different
names, Maunibaba because he observed periodic vows of silence, Bangali Baba because
he was a Bengali, Tinkudi Baba from his nickname as a child, but that his initiation name
was Kisori-kisorananda Baba. He also told me that this baba was quite unusual because,
although he came from a highly respected family of caste Gowsamis tracing back to
Nityananda Prabhu, he had left family life behind and had adopted a life of deprivation
and solitary worship. He warned me that getting initiation from him would be difficult,
because he led an extremely austere life, living out in the wildest parts of the Vrajamandala
where few people dared to go. Dr. Kapoor spoke of others, too, who occupied
very high places in the climb towards Krsna-rati. He mentioned, in particular,
Krsnacarana Das Baba, who eventually became the guru of my friend and colleague,
Jagannath Das.
The name ”Tinkudi Baba” operated like a powerful mantra in my mind. It kept returning
to me again and again. I had no idea where he was and how I would ever meet him,
though. My only choice was to wait. I don’t recall how I met them, but I had become
friends with a couple of Vrajavasis, a young man name Parimal Bishwas and his
grandmother Vinaparni. They had settled in Vrindaban and lived in a small rented house
near the Ranganath temple. Occasionally, I visited them and joined them for dinner.
Vinaparni was an excellent cook and I knew them both to be Vaisnavas. It was perhaps
only a couple of days after first hearing the name of Tinkudi Baba from Dr. Kapoor that I
asked Parimal about this Baba. He looked up with surprise on his face and blurted out:
”He is my guru! How did you hear about him?” I told him about my conversations with
Dr. Kapoor and repeated the good doctor’s praise for the baba. I also asked him what he
knew about the initiation of Bhaktisiddhanta. Parimal was the first of those I talked with
about it to confirm it. He had learned of it from his grandmother, who it turned out had
formerly been a disciple of the Gaudiya Math, and who was among those who left
somewhat after the time of Puridas. When I asked her later, she, too, confirmed Dr.
Kapoor’s statement. She had been closely connected with Haridas Sarma who had acted
as Puridas’s secretary towards the end of his life. Haridas Sarma had helped Puridas
publish the later volumes of the wonderful set of editions of the Gaudiya Vaisnava texts
that Puridas is famous for. Haridas’s name is given as the publisher of the Puridas
editions beginning sometime in the 1950s.
I asked Parimal if he would help me meet the baba. He responded with an enthusiastic
affirmative and a few days later came to tell me that Baba was in Cakleswar on the bank
of the Manasasarovar near Govardhan. He was there to celebrate the ceremony of the
feeding of the sixty-four saints (cau-sasti mahant seva) to honor a great Vaisnava who had
just passed away. Parimal agreed to take me there and introduce me. A few days later I
was on a bus to Mathura and from Mathura out to Cakleswar with Parimal by my side.
29
When I first met Baba, tears did not begin flowing from my eyes like Dr. Kapoor’s did
when he and his wife met their guru, Gauranga Das Baba. I didn’t feel like I had met an
old friend again after a very long time. Instead, I was a bit surprised at Baba’s
appearance. It was only slowly, after watching him move about giving directions to his
disciples and others on how to celebrate the entrance of a fellow devotee of Krsna into
eternal sport that I began to get a sense of who he was. I first noticed the way he dressed.
He wore only a kaupin or loincloth over his genitals and a cloth over his shoulders and his
hair was long, stringy, and uncombed, hanging down to his shoulders. Around his neck
were some of the largest tulsi beads I had ever seen and on his forehead was the tilak
(sectarian mark) typical of Nityananda-paribar (associates of Nityananda), made not out
of the white, powdery gopi-candana that was typical of ISKCON and Gaudiya Math, but
out of the dark, thick, greyish mud which, as I later found out, came from Radhakunda.
Except for the tilak, he looked more like a Sakta than a Vaisnava. I suddenly realized that
I had seen his picture a year or two before in a tiny stall in one of the markets of
Navadwip where I had gone to buy a copy of the classic book on the Holy Name (Sri Sri
Nama-cintmani by Kanupriya Goswami. The stall owner, after bringing out the book,
brought out a picture of Tinkudi Baba thinking I would also want one of those. I took one
look at the picture and thought to myself why does he think I want a picture of that mad
tantric? I had no idea who I was looking at at that time.
As I watched him I began notice how genuinely jovial he was and how humble. He
seemed thoroughly happy. He had next to nothing and yet he was happy. All of his
clothes were made of burlap. Even his slippers were made of burlap. Apart from that he
had nothing else but his beads. I couldn’t imagine Prabhupad walking on such cloth with
his bare feet even once, let alone wearing it constantly. What a difference there was
between the really humble, simple lifestyle of this poor servant of Krsna, who depended
for everything on Krsna, and that of Prabhupad, who lived like a king wearing silk and
gold and complained if his food wasn’t prepared just right. It was as if at some point
Krsna had offered these two devotees of his a choice. Prabhupad had chosen Krsna’s
wealth, his army so to speak, and Baba had chosen Krsna himself. A whole new world of
Vaisnavism began to open up before me in the presence of Tinkudi Baba, a world strange
and beautiful and, truth be told, also somewhat terrifying, especially to someone like me
who had not fully surrendered to the will of Krsna. How much easier it appeared to be to
be a Prabhupad and sit on a fancy lion-throne surrounded by thousands of doting and
adulating disciples. Bba sat out in a lonely kutir in the distant reaches of Vraja, wild
snake-infested places where few people dared to go. He ate whatever could be begged
from the local villagers, and if they gave nothing, that is what he had.
Reflecting back on my first experience of Baba a couple of things stand out. The first is
the realization that part of the shock of my first meeting with Baba was contributed by
the sense of having come face to face with something very ancient in India. His
nakedness, his simplicity, his possessionlessness, his austerity, and as I later discovered
later his ecstatic madnesses, all point to a kind of religious lifestyle and experience that is
30
quite ancient in India. One need only recall the naked philosophers that Alexander the
Great encountered when he came to India, three centuries before the common era. One
of these gymnosophists accompanied Alexander back to Greece and displaced Aristotle
as the conqueror’s teacher. Even in the time of Alexander, however, such asceticism was
ancient. The hymn of the Rig Veda called ”The Long-hair” (10.136) indicates similar
practices at least seven centuries before Alexander. The second verse of that hymn reads:
The ascetics, swathed in wind, put dirty red rags on.
When gods enter them, they ride with the rush of the wind.
(O’Flaherty, p. 137)
Certainly much has changed in the intervening thirty centuries. Then it was Rudra; now it
is Radha and Krsna. Still, much remained the same. I felt like I had arrived in the
company of Rupa and Sanatana. Certainly, they lived much like this.
The second thing is that in Baba I am reminded of the belief in the ”righteous man” in
the Jewish mystical tradition called Kabbalah. The righteous man or tsaddiq is like a
pillar that extends to heaven and upholds the entire world. It is said in the tradition: ”the
righteous one is the foundation of the world.” If it weakens, the world cannot endure. If
the world contains just one righteous person, that person sustains the world. (Matt, p. 78)
I wonder if it is similar with the siddha- mahapurus. a, that they are the foundation of the
world. Without them the world would collapse. The other thing about the tsaddiq is that
often it is impossible to recognize one. There is a wonderful story from the Zohar called
”The old man and the ravishing maiden” in which the righteous one appears as an old
donkey driver who seems rather cracked. Similarly, I wonder if the siddha is often to be
found in unlikely places. Perhaps, he is not to be found on the simhasana in front of the
lights and cameras, but out in the darkness lit up only by the dim glow of a kerosene
latern and perhaps it is only because of him that Krsna has not smashed the whole world.
ESCAPE FROM THE HALL OF MIRRORS
Part 2
Nitai Das
2005
After I met Tinkudi Baba, sometime in 1975, the world seemed like a different place
altogether. The despair I felt when I discovered the absence of authentic initiation in
ISKCON turned into hope. I was filled with a new enthusiasm. I went back to my normal
life at the Krsna Balarama temple in Vrindaban where I had settled after leaving
Prabhupada’s traveling party.
For about two years I had travelled with Prabhupada as his Sanskrit Secretary. During
31
that time we circled the earth at least four times. I had joined the party in 1973 because
the editors at the Press were worried about a slow down in the pace at which my
predecessor, Pradyumna Prabhu, was working. At that time Prabhupada was translating
the Bhagavata Purana, Cantos Four, Five, and Six. It was the Sanskrit Secretary’s job to
collect the tapes that Prabhupada made each morning, get them typed, check them over
for typos or uncertainties, add the diacritics to the transliterated Sanskrit verses and
quotations (sometimes hunt for those quotations, too), and make any minor editing
changes that were needed. If there was any question about a translation or citation, the
editor went straight to Prabhupada to ask about it. Pradyumna had travelled with
Prabhupada for about a year or two, but after a while he began to lapse into periods of
inaction or at best ineffective action during which the typed manuscripts, hot off the holy
Dictaphone, so to speak, began to pile up. Eventually even Prabhupada became
frustrated. He once affectionately referred to Pradyumna Prabhu as a “dead horse” and
pointed out that it was useless to try to beat a dead horse into action. At last, Prabhupada
agreed to adding another member to the party to help Pradyumna get caught up. At that
time I was the head of the Sanskrit Editing Department at the Press which was then in
Brooklyn and, well, I jumped at the opportunity to travel with Prabhupada. Naturally,
neither my wife at the time, Rastrapalika, nor my chief assistant, Jagannatha Das, were
very pleased, my wife, because of the separation involved, and Jagannatha because he felt
it should have been him, since he had no family ties. Perhaps he was right.
My time traveling with Prabhupada was a magical time. At first Pradyumna and I
travelled together with Prabhupada working jointly to diminish the backlog. Then at
some point Pradyumna dropped off the travelling party for a while, I forget why. That left
me to handle the editing alone. At some points I was the only traveling secretary,
handling the duties of all the others in the traveling party: cooking for Prabhupada, giving
him his daily massages, seeing to his laundry, and helping him with correspondence, and
editing his manuscripts. Perhaps in a later installment I will recount some of my
experiences as one of Prabhupada’s traveling secretaries. For now, however, suffice it to
say that after nearly nearly two years of nearly ceaseless wandering around the globe with
Prabhupada, I was happy to settle down in Vrindaban, edit the tail end of the Bhagavata
backlog, teach Sanskrit to the new Gurukula students (Gurukula was the name of the
ISKCON school in Vrindaban) and, at Prabhupada’s request, work on a curriculum for
the Gurukula that would get the school accredited by the government of India. Those
were the tasks I returned to, somewhat reluctantly, after meeting Baba.
Working on the Gurukula curriculum was fun and interesting, however. My plan of action
was to find a curriculum that was already accredited by the government of India and
reproduce it, but using books from within Caitanya Vaisnava tradition. I decided to check
into the traditional Sanskrit school system to see what they used as a curriculum. I visited
some of the local Vrindaban Pathasalas (schools) and even enrolled in one for a time.
Working from a copy of the curriculum they used, which was established and supported
by the respected Sampurnananda Samskrta Visvavidyalaya in Benares, the primary
32
Sanskrit institution in India, I began replacing the texts with comparable ones belonging
to the Caitanya tradition. I visited several of the leading Caitanya Vaisnava scholars in
Vrindaban to ask for advice on texts to incorporate in the curriculum. I visited Sri
Nrisimha Vallabha Goswami, Dr. Achyut Lal Bhatt Goswami, Haridas Shastri, Vanamali
Das Shastri, Dr. O.B.L. Kapoor and many others who were learned in the
Caitanya tradition. Based on their advice I created a curriculum that had everything the
traditional curriculum had, except that most of the texts were written by the great
Vaisnava teachers in the tradition of Mahaprabhu. The areas of study included in the
traditional curriculum were Sanskrit grammar (vyakarana), literary criticism (alankarasastra),
ritual (smrti), philosophy (darsana), literature (sahitya), astrology/astronomy
(jyotisa), arithmetic/ mathematics (ganita), and an optional choice of modern languages
(Hindi, Bengali, English, etc). The course of study generally lasted eight years and
concluded with the bestowing of the degree or title Sastri on those who successfully
passed the exams. The first set of exams, one in each of the eight areas, was administered
after three years, the second set after another three years, and the degree exams two
years after that. There were higher degrees like Acarya and Vidyavaridhi comparable to
the Master’s and Doctoral degrees, but I didn’t worry about those then. Those generally
required an original piece of research. There were a few texts from outside the Caitanya
tradition that my informants thought were so fundamental that they recommended they
be part of any Vaisnava’s education. These were texts like the Vedanta-sara of
Sadananda, the Vedanta paribhasa of Dharmaraja Adhvarindra, the Tarkasangraha of
Annambhatta, and a few others. The curriculum I developed then has more or less
become the basis for the curriculum of the Caitanya Sanskrit Tol currently operating
through Nitai’s Bhajan Kutir.
Apart from my work on the curriculum, editing, and teaching in the Gurukula, I would
often go in the afternoons to visit Dr. Kapoor. He would offer me some prasadi (offered)
sweets from his household deities and we would talk for hours about points of philosophy
and practice. Dr. Kapoor was very kind to me and took some risks with me that I hope he
never came to regret. As we sat together in the small sitting room of his house which was
part of the compound of the Radharamana Temple, his hand was always in his bead bag
and the Mahamantra was always being repreated just beneath his breath. He told me
much about his own religious life, his conversion, as a young philosophy professor, from
the aridity of monistic Vedanta to Caitanya theism at the hands of Bhaktisiddhanta
Sarasvati, his first meeting, much later, with Gauranga Das Baba, the power of the line of
Bodo Baba (Sri Radharamana Carana Dasa Baba) who was the guru of the guru of Sri
Gauranga Das Baba, the wonderful ability of both Bodo Baba and Ram Das Baba
(Gauranga Das Baba’s guru) to create kirtans spontaneously that answered unspoken
questions in the minds of those who happened to be listening. He explained a great deal
about the meaning and power of the famous chant that has become the trademark kirtan
of the tradition following Bodo Baba:
33
bhaja nitai gaura radhe syama
japa hare krsna hare rama
Worship Nitai and Gaura (Caitanya),
Radha and Syama.
Utter Hare Krsna Hare Rama
Dr. Kapoor claimed that the short Bhaja Nitai Gaura chant compressed the whole of
Caitanya Vaisnava practice into a few sweet and rhythmic words, easy to remember and
easy to chant. He said it had extraordinary powers, that apart from inducing powerful
religous ecstasy it could cure the sick and even raise the dead. He also told me of how at
various times in his life when he was in some kind of difficulty or confusion, Bodo Baba
himself had appeared to him in his dreams and shown him his mercy by giving him help
and guidance. Since the first of those experiences the Bhaja Nitai Gaura chant had been
a source of solace, protection, joy for him. Though Dr. Kapoor didn’t tell me about how
this chant came about during those talks, I recently looked up the account of how it was
revealed in the biography of Bodo Baba called Nectar of the Acts [of Bodo Baba]
(Carita-sudha) compiled by Ram Das Baba. Here is a paraphrase of the biography’s
account of that event.
This extraordinary chant was revealed by Bodo Baba in the midst of an intense kirtan he
led during a prolonged stay in Krishnagar. While singing a particular kirtan song Bodo
Baba went into a deep trance. Tears began to flow from his eyes in streams and his body
was covered with goose-bumps. An instant later his body shook violently like a tree in a
powerful wind and he fell unconscious on the ground. The devotees surrounded him and
began to chant the Holy Name. Seeing in his body the rising and falling of waves of
powerful emotions, the devotees became astonished. When he became paralyzed with
emotion, it seemed as if his body was devoid of life. Then in an instant he would laugh, in
the next moment he would cry, a moment later he would shiver and a moment after that
he would be covered with goosebumps. After a while he came halfway to consciousness
and stutteringly uttered:
bhaja nitai gaura pabe radhe syama
japa hare krsna hare rama
The meaning here is a little different from the form above:
Worship Nitai and Gaura (Caitanya)
and you will get Radha and Syama.
Recite Hare Krsna Hare Rama
Some of the devotees who surrounded him began to sing these words and that grew into a
kirtan that lasted long into the night. One group would sing the first line and another
34
group would respond with the second, each group seemingly trying to overpower the
other. Some time later during the kirtan Bodo Baba, leaning against a wall, his eyes half
open, his body drenched in tears and covered with goose-flesh, a smile on his face, raised
the pointing finger of his right hand and swayed back and forth in intense emotion. At
some point, too, a wonderful, mind-attracting aroma filled the place, but none of the
devotees could find its source. Around about midnight, the kirtan began to wind down,
but Bodo Baba continued to be overwhelmed with feeling.
At the time that Bodo Baba fell into his ecstasy, he was singing a song which apparently
he composed. The short Bhaja Nitai Gaura chant seems to have condensed out of that
longer song as its essential meaning. As such, the longer song is a kind of commentary on
the short one. That longer song is this:
Nitai and Gaura dance like Radha and Krsna
Everyone sings ”hare krsna hare rama.”
If you really want this Gauranga,
become a servant of Nityananda.
Even one who says only with his mouth:
”I am a servant of Nity¯ananda”
will perceive the true form of Gaura.
The love of the gopi as in the Bhagavata
one will get only from Nityananda in this world.
Nityananda is the giver of love;
Gauranga is his greatest treasure.
In the pleasure of the Rasa dance,
one will meet Sri Radharamana.
Climbing aboard the boat ”hare krsna hare rama,”
cross over the ocean of rebirth to Vrndavana.
My Nitai frolics, my Nitai plays,
All who are maddened with love he makes his own.
Here my Nitai dances, overwhelmed with emotion.
Whomever he finds, even a Candala, he takes on his lap.
Dr. Kapoor told me that contrary to the misinterpretations of various ISKCON and GM
members, the juxtaposition of Nitai-Gaura and Radhe- Syama is not meant to imply the
identification of Nityananda with Radha. Such an identification is never made in the line
of Bodo Baba. Only someone completely ignorant of the history and meaning of the song
would make such a claim. This song is clearly about the power of Nityananda as the one
who can conduct one to the feet of Gauranga who is in turn the joined form of Radha
and Krsna. The power and influence of Nityananda is so much a part of the teaching of
Bodo Baba that those who knew him and those who are initiated in his line consider him
to be a saktyavesa avatara or empowered incarnation of Nityananda. The idea that one
must approach Mahaprabhu through Nityananda is not an uncommon one in the
35

Caitanya tradition.